Adherence to IRS and Department of Labor regulations governing employer-sponsored 401(k) retirement savings plans.
Key Takeaways
401(k) compliance covers every legal and regulatory obligation an employer must meet when sponsoring a 401(k) retirement savings plan. The rules come from two federal agencies: the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), which governs tax-qualified status and contribution limits, and the Department of Labor (DOL), which enforces fiduciary duties and participant protections. Getting compliance wrong isn't just an administrative headache. Penalties can be steep. The IRS can disqualify the entire plan, which means all tax-deferred employee contributions suddenly become taxable income. The DOL can impose civil penalties, and in cases of fiduciary breach, individual plan administrators can face personal liability. With over 70 million active participants and $7.7 trillion in plan assets (Investment Company Institute, 2024), 401(k) plans are the most common employer-sponsored retirement vehicle in the US. HR teams, payroll departments, and plan administrators share responsibility for keeping these plans compliant.
HR doesn't just enroll employees in the plan and move on. HR teams are typically responsible for timely enrollment of eligible employees, accurate deduction of contributions from payroll, communication of plan features and changes to participants, and coordination with the plan's third-party administrator (TPA) and recordkeeper. A single missed enrollment window or late contribution deposit can trigger a compliance violation. In the DOL's most recent enforcement data, late deposits of employee contributions were the most frequently cited violation in 401(k) audits.
The IRS sets contribution limits, approves plan qualification, and enforces tax rules. The DOL enforces ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974), which sets fiduciary standards, reporting requirements, and participant rights. The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) doesn't cover 401(k) plans directly (it covers defined benefit pensions), but its existence reflects the broader regulatory environment. The SECURE Act (2019) and SECURE 2.0 Act (2022) made the biggest changes to 401(k) rules in decades, including auto-enrollment requirements for new plans starting in 2025.
The IRS adjusts contribution limits annually based on cost-of-living calculations. Here are the current numbers for 2025, published in IRS Notice 2024-80.
| Limit Type | 2025 Amount | 2024 Amount | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Employee elective deferral | $23,500 | $23,000 | Maximum an employee can contribute from their paycheck pre-tax or Roth |
| Catch-up contribution (age 50+) | $7,500 | $7,500 | Additional amount for employees aged 50 and older |
| Super catch-up (ages 60-63) | $11,250 | N/A (new in 2025) | SECURE 2.0 provision allowing higher catch-up for those aged 60 to 63 |
| Total annual addition (415 limit) | $70,000 | $69,000 | Combined employee + employer contributions per participant |
| Highly compensated employee (HCE) threshold | $160,000 | $155,000 | Employees earning above this are subject to non-discrimination testing limits |
| Key employee threshold | $230,000 | $220,000 | For top-heavy testing purposes |
Non-discrimination tests are the IRS's way of ensuring that 401(k) plans don't disproportionately benefit highly compensated employees (HCEs) at the expense of non-highly compensated employees (NHCEs). These tests are among the most technically complex aspects of 401(k) compliance, and failing them requires corrective action within strict deadlines.
The ADP test compares the average deferral rate of HCEs to the average deferral rate of NHCEs. If HCEs are deferring too much more than NHCEs, the plan fails. The allowed gap depends on the NHCE average: if NHCEs defer 2% or less, HCEs can defer up to 2x that amount. If NHCEs defer more than 2%, HCEs can defer up to 2 percentage points more. For example, if NHCEs average 4%, HCEs can average up to 6%. If HCEs average 7%, the plan fails the ADP test.
The ACP test works the same way as the ADP test but looks at employer matching contributions and after-tax employee contributions instead of elective deferrals. The same percentage limits apply. Plans that offer generous matches to all employees regardless of level typically pass the ACP test without issues.
A plan is top-heavy if more than 60% of total plan assets belong to "key employees" (officers earning above $230,000 in 2025, 5%+ owners, or 1%+ owners earning above $150,000). Top-heavy plans must provide minimum contributions (typically 3% of compensation) to all NHCEs, regardless of whether those employees are deferring their own money. This test protects rank-and-file employees from being shut out of meaningful retirement benefits.
Companies can avoid ADP and ACP testing entirely by adopting a safe harbor plan design. Safe harbor requires the employer to make one of three contribution types: a 3% non-elective contribution to all eligible employees (regardless of whether they contribute), a basic match (100% of the first 3% deferred, plus 50% of the next 2%), or an enhanced match (any formula at least as generous as the basic match). Safe harbor contributions must vest immediately. The trade-off is cost: the employer commits to a guaranteed contribution. But for companies that regularly fail non-discrimination tests or want administrative simplicity, safe harbor is usually worth it.
Anyone who exercises discretion over a 401(k) plan's management, assets, or administration is considered a fiduciary under ERISA. That often includes HR directors, CFOs, plan committee members, and sometimes even individual managers who influence plan decisions. Fiduciary status comes with personal legal liability.
ERISA requires fiduciaries to act solely in the interest of plan participants and beneficiaries (the "exclusive benefit" rule), exercise prudence (the "prudent expert" standard, not just the "reasonable person" standard), diversify plan investments to minimize the risk of large losses, and follow the plan documents unless doing so would violate ERISA. The prudent expert standard is higher than most people realize. Fiduciaries are held to the standard of someone with expertise in the subject matter, even if they personally lack that expertise. That's why most plan sponsors hire investment advisors and TPAs.
Fiduciaries who breach their duties can be held personally liable for plan losses. This isn't hypothetical. In 2023, the DOL recovered $1.4 billion in enforcement actions related to employee benefit plans (DOL Annual Report). Common breaches include selecting high-fee investment options without proper due diligence, failing to monitor plan investments over time, using plan assets to benefit the company rather than participants, and not correcting known errors in plan administration. Fiduciary liability insurance (ERISA bond) is required for all plan fiduciaries, with minimum coverage of 10% of plan assets up to $500,000.
The DOL and IRS publish enforcement data showing the most frequent compliance failures. Knowing these helps HR teams focus audit preparation on the areas most likely to cause problems.
This is the number one violation cited in DOL audits. ERISA requires employee contributions (money deducted from paychecks) to be deposited into the plan trust as soon as they can reasonably be segregated from the employer's general assets. The DOL's safe harbor deadline is 7 business days after the payroll date for plans with fewer than 100 participants. For larger plans, the expectation is even faster, often 1 to 3 business days. Late deposits require correction through the DOL's Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program (VFCP), which includes making the employee whole for lost earnings.
The plan document is the legal backbone of the 401(k). If it says employees are eligible after 90 days but HR enrolls them at 6 months, that's a compliance failure. If the document specifies a matching formula but payroll calculates a different amount, that's a failure too. Every operational decision must match what the plan document says. When discrepancies are found, they must be corrected through the IRS's Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System (EPCRS).
Failing to enroll an eligible employee, or enrolling them late, is a common error, especially in companies with complex eligibility rules (waiting periods, hours thresholds, union exclusions). SECURE 2.0 complicates this further by requiring auto-enrollment for new plans established after December 29, 2022. Employees must be enrolled at a default deferral rate of at least 3% but no more than 10%, with annual escalation of 1% up to at least 10%.
Matching contribution errors happen when payroll systems calculate the match incorrectly, often due to definition mismatches ("compensation" means different things in different plan documents) or timing issues with true-up calculations. Mid-year changes to compensation definitions or matching formulas also create errors if systems aren't updated promptly.
The SECURE 2.0 Act, signed in December 2022, made the most significant changes to retirement plan rules in decades. Many provisions phase in over several years. Here are the changes HR teams need to track.
New 401(k) plans established after December 29, 2022 must auto-enroll employees at a deferral rate between 3% and 10%, with automatic escalation of 1% per year up to at least 10% but no more than 15%. Existing plans are exempt. Small businesses with 10 or fewer employees, companies less than 3 years old, church plans, and government plans are also exempt.
Employees aged 60 to 63 can now contribute up to $11,250 as a catch-up contribution (up from $7,500 for other catch-up eligible employees). This "super catch-up" is indexed to inflation. Starting in 2026, catch-up contributions for employees earning over $145,000 must be made as Roth (after-tax) contributions only.
Employers can now treat employee student loan payments as elective deferrals for matching purposes. If an employee can't afford to contribute to the 401(k) because they're paying off student loans, the employer can still provide a matching contribution based on the loan payments. This is optional, not required, but it's a meaningful benefit for attracting younger workers with student debt.
Plans can now offer a separate emergency savings account linked to the 401(k), allowing non-highly compensated employees to save up to $2,500 in a Roth after-tax account. Withdrawals from this account are penalty-free and tax-free, giving employees a financial cushion without tapping retirement savings.
Use this checklist to structure your annual compliance review. Most plan years end December 31, so the heaviest compliance workload falls in Q1 and Q2 of the following year.
The IRS and DOL both offer formal correction programs because they recognize that operational errors are inevitable. The key is finding and fixing them quickly.
EPCRS has three tiers. Self-Correction Program (SCP) lets plans fix insignificant errors without filing with the IRS or paying fees. Voluntary Correction Program (VCP) requires a filing with the IRS and a fee (ranging from $350 to $3,500 depending on plan size) but provides a formal compliance statement. Audit Closing Agreement Program (Audit CAP) is used when the IRS finds errors during an audit and negotiates a correction and penalty. SCP is the most commonly used tier. Most operational errors (missed deferrals, incorrect matching, late enrollment) can be self-corrected if discovered and fixed within a reasonable period.
The VFCP covers fiduciary breaches, primarily late deposits of employee contributions. Employers must calculate lost earnings (using the DOL's online calculator), deposit the corrected amount plus earnings into participant accounts, and file an application with the DOL. The benefit of using VFCP is that the DOL issues a no-action letter, meaning they won't pursue further enforcement for the corrected violation.
Simple errors (a few late deposits, a missed enrollment corrected within the plan year) can usually be handled by the TPA. But if you discover systematic errors affecting many participants, if the error involves fiduciary breach or misuse of plan assets, or if you receive a DOL audit notice, bring in an ERISA attorney. The cost of legal advice is small compared to the potential penalties for mishandled corrections.