UK tax legislation determining whether a contractor working through an intermediary (typically a personal service company) should be treated as an employee for income tax and National Insurance purposes, with liability shifting to the end client for medium and large businesses since April 2021.
Key Takeaways
Before IR35, a permanent employee could resign on Friday, set up a limited company over the weekend, and return to the same desk on Monday doing the same job, but paying significantly less tax. The company would pay the PSC a fee. The contractor would take a small salary and extract the remainder as dividends, avoiding both employer and employee NICs on most of their income. IR35 exists to close that gap. It says: if the working relationship looks like employment in substance (regardless of the contractual structure), the tax treatment should reflect that reality. For HR and procurement teams, IR35 affects every contractor engagement. It determines how contracts are structured, how status assessments are conducted, who bears the tax liability, and whether the organisation can attract contractor talent at competitive rates.
Determining whether IR35 applies requires examining the actual working relationship, not just what the contract says. Three factors carry the most weight in case law and HMRC guidance.
Personal service: Can the contractor send a substitute to do the work in their place? A genuine, unfettered right of substitution (not just a theoretical clause in a contract that's never exercised) is the strongest indicator of self-employment. Control: Does the client control what work is done, when it's done, where it's done, and how it's done? The more control the client exercises, the more the relationship looks like employment. Mutuality of obligation (MOO): Is the client obliged to offer work, and is the contractor obliged to accept it? If the answer is yes to both, there's MOO, which points toward employment. HMRC's CEST tool has been criticised for not adequately assessing MOO.
Beyond the three main tests, tribunals and HMRC consider: whether the contractor provides their own equipment, whether they have financial risk (fixed price vs. time and materials), whether they work for multiple clients, whether they're integrated into the client's organisation (company email, badge, org chart), the length and exclusivity of the engagement, and whether the contractor has the right to profit from sound management. No single factor is decisive. It's the overall picture that matters.
The off-payroll working rules shifted responsibility for IR35 status determination from the contractor's PSC to the end client. This was the biggest change to contractor taxation in the UK since IR35's introduction.
Medium and large private sector clients must determine the IR35 status of every contractor engagement, issue a Status Determination Statement (SDS) to the contractor and the fee-payer (often an agency), and take reasonable care in making the determination. Small companies (meeting 2 of 3 criteria: turnover not exceeding GBP 10.2M, balance sheet not exceeding GBP 5.1M, not more than 50 employees) are exempt. For small company engagements, the contractor's PSC retains responsibility for determining and applying IR35.
Step 1: Assess the engagement using CEST, external IR35 assessment tools (such as IR35 Shield, Qdos, or Kingsbridge), or specialist legal advice. Step 2: Issue a Status Determination Statement to the contractor and the agency (if one exists). The SDS must include the determination (inside or outside IR35) and the reasons for reaching that conclusion. Step 3: If the contractor disagrees, they have a right to challenge the determination. The client must have a process for considering disagreements and must respond within 45 days. Step 4: If the engagement is inside IR35, the fee-payer (the entity paying the PSC, often an agency) must deduct PAYE tax and NICs before paying the contractor.
The tax difference between being inside and outside IR35 is significant, which is why both contractors and clients care so much about getting the determination right.
| Component | Outside IR35 (PSC) | Inside IR35 (deemed employment) |
|---|---|---|
| Income tax | Salary taxed at marginal rate; dividends taxed at lower dividend rates | All income taxed at marginal PAYE rates |
| Employee NICs | Paid on small salary only (typically GBP 12,570); none on dividends | Paid on all deemed employment income above the threshold |
| Employer NICs | Paid by PSC on small salary only | Paid by the fee-payer on all deemed employment income |
| Corporation tax | PSC pays 19-25% on retained profits | Not applicable (no PSC profit retention) |
| 5% expense allowance | Not applicable outside IR35 | 5% of gross fees deductible before calculating deemed payment (IR35 only) |
| Approximate take-home difference | Contractor retains more | 20-25% reduction in take-home pay on a typical GBP 500/day contract |
HMRC has significantly increased its IR35 enforcement activity since the off-payroll rules shifted liability to end clients.
HMRC targets organisations with high contractor populations, particularly in IT, consulting, financial services, and the public sector. Red flags include: blanket status determinations (determining all contractors as inside or all as outside IR35 without individual assessment), contractors who've been engaged for long periods on rolling contracts, engagements where the contractor works exclusively for one client, CEST results that haven't been reviewed or are inconsistent with the actual working practices, and tip-offs from disgruntled contractors or whistleblowers.
If HMRC determines that IR35 was wrongly applied and the engagement should have been inside IR35, the fee-payer (or the end client if it failed in its status determination duties) faces: back-payment of PAYE income tax and employee NICs for all affected tax years (up to 6 years, or 20 years if HMRC suspects deliberate non-compliance), employer NICs on all back-dated payments, interest on unpaid tax from the original due date, and penalties of up to 100% of the unpaid tax for careless or deliberate errors. In some cases, HMRC has also pursued directors personally for failing to operate PAYE correctly.
The Check Employment Status for Tax tool is HMRC's free online tool for making IR35 status determinations.
CEST asks a series of questions about the engagement and provides one of three outcomes: inside IR35 (deemed employed), outside IR35 (self-employed for tax purposes), or unable to determine (further information needed). HMRC states it will stand by CEST results as long as the information entered was accurate and the tool wasn't deliberately manipulated. The tool is free, official, and HMRC-binding, which makes it the default starting point for most status determinations.
CEST doesn't adequately assess mutuality of obligation, which many tax professionals consider a fundamental flaw. It produces "unable to determine" results in a significant proportion of cases, leaving organisations with no clear answer. Several tribunal decisions have disagreed with CEST outcomes. The questions can be ambiguous, and different users interpreting the same engagement can reach different conclusions. Many organisations use CEST as a starting point but supplement it with specialist legal advice or third-party IR35 assessment tools for high-risk or high-value engagements.
Managing IR35 compliance requires a structured approach that covers every contractor engagement across the organisation.
Key data points on IR35 enforcement and contractor engagement in the UK.