Australia's primary federal privacy legislation, regulating how organisations and government agencies collect, use, store, and disclose personal information, including employee data, through 13 Australian Privacy Principles (APPs).
Key Takeaways
The Privacy Act tells organisations what they can and can't do with people's personal information. For HR teams, this creates a dual reality. On one hand, there's a broad employee records exemption that means most of what you do with employee data doesn't fall under the APPs. On the other hand, that exemption has significant gaps that catch many HR teams off guard. The employee records exemption only applies to information in an "employee record" held by the employer. It doesn't cover: job applicants (their resumes, interview notes, and reference checks are fully subject to the APPs), contractors (who aren't employees), health surveillance data collected under WHS obligations (which may fall outside the employee record definition), and any data transferred to a third party (like a cloud-based HRIS provider). The 2022 Optus and Medibank data breaches prompted the government to significantly increase penalties. A body corporate now faces fines of up to $50 million per serious or repeated breach. This changed the risk calculation for every organisation. A major government review completed in 2023 recommended abolishing the employee records exemption entirely, which would bring all employee data under the APPs. If enacted, this would be the most significant change to HR data management in Australia since the Act was introduced.
The APPs apply to organisations with annual turnover above $3 million, government agencies, and certain other entities regardless of size.
| APP # | Name | Key Requirement |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Open and transparent management | Have a clearly expressed, up-to-date privacy policy describing how you handle personal information |
| 2 | Anonymity and pseudonymity | Give individuals the option of not identifying themselves where practicable |
| 3 | Collection of solicited personal information | Only collect personal information that is reasonably necessary for your functions; collect sensitive information only with consent |
| 4 | Dealing with unsolicited personal information | If you receive information you didn't ask for, determine if you could have collected it under APP 3; if not, destroy or de-identify it |
| 5 | Notification of collection | Tell individuals what information you're collecting, why, who it will be shared with, and how they can access or complain |
| 6 | Use or disclosure | Only use or disclose information for the primary purpose of collection, or a related secondary purpose the individual would reasonably expect |
| 7 | Direct marketing | Don't use personal information for direct marketing unless the individual would reasonably expect it or has consented |
| 8 | Cross-border disclosure | Before disclosing personal information to an overseas recipient, take reasonable steps to ensure they comply with the APPs |
| 9 | Adoption, use, or disclosure of government identifiers | Don't use government identifiers (like Tax File Numbers) as your own identifier |
| 10 | Quality of personal information | Take reasonable steps to ensure personal information is accurate, up-to-date, complete, and relevant |
| 11 | Security of personal information | Protect personal information from misuse, interference, loss, unauthorised access, modification, or disclosure; destroy or de-identify when no longer needed |
| 12 | Access to personal information | Give individuals access to their personal information on request |
| 13 | Correction of personal information | Correct personal information that is inaccurate, out-of-date, incomplete, irrelevant, or misleading |
This exemption is the most important Privacy Act provision for HR teams, and the most misunderstood.
Section 7B(3) exempts an organisation from the APPs in relation to an "employee record" about a current or former employee, where the information relates directly to the employment relationship. Employee records include information about: the employee's terms and conditions of employment, their engagement, training, disciplining or termination, health information related to fitness for work, trade union membership, leave and taxation records, and banking details for salary payments.
The exemption doesn't apply to: job applicants (they're not employees), contractors and volunteers (they're not employees), health surveillance data collected under WHS obligations (may fall outside the employment relationship nexus), information shared with third parties (once data leaves the employer's hands, the exemption may not follow), and information used for a purpose unrelated to the employment relationship. If you use employee data for marketing purposes, the exemption doesn't apply to that use. If you share employee data with a cloud HRIS provider, the cross-border disclosure requirements (APP 8) may apply if the provider stores data overseas.
The Attorney-General's Department Privacy Act Review Report (2023) recommended removing the employee records exemption. If implemented, all employee data would be subject to the full APPs, including consent requirements for collecting sensitive information, access and correction rights, and the Notifiable Data Breaches scheme. The government has agreed "in principle" to this recommendation but hasn't set a timeline. HR teams should prepare by treating employee data as if the exemption didn't exist, which many privacy advisors already recommend.
Since February 2018, organisations must report eligible data breaches to the OAIC and affected individuals.
An eligible data breach occurs when there's unauthorised access, disclosure, or loss of personal information, a reasonable person would conclude the breach is likely to result in serious harm, and the organisation hasn't been able to prevent the likely harm through remedial action. Serious harm includes identity theft, financial loss, physical harm, serious psychological harm, and damage to reputation. The notification must be made to the OAIC as soon as practicable after the organisation becomes aware (or should have become aware) of the breach. A 30-day assessment period applies from the time the organisation suspects a breach has occurred.
Common data breach scenarios in HR include: payroll data sent to the wrong recipient via email, HRIS system compromised by cyberattack exposing employee records, physical personnel files lost or stolen, terminated employee's access to HR systems not promptly revoked, and employee health records accessed by unauthorized staff. Even where the employee records exemption applies, best practice (and often state legislation) requires notification. And if the breach involves applicant data, contractor data, or data held by a third-party provider, the NDB scheme applies in full.
Practical steps to meet Privacy Act obligations in an HR context.
The 2022 amendments dramatically increased the consequences for privacy breaches.
The OAIC can: investigate complaints and conduct own-motion investigations, make determinations requiring organisations to take specific actions (compensation, apology, policy changes), accept enforceable undertakings, seek civil penalties in the Federal Court for serious or repeated interferences with privacy, and issue infringement notices for specific administrative breaches. The OAIC also publishes investigation outcomes, which means reputational damage accompanies formal enforcement action.
| Entity Type | Maximum Penalty Per Serious/Repeated Breach | Alternative Calculations |
|---|---|---|
| Body corporate | $50,000,000 | 3x the value of benefit obtained, or 30% of adjusted turnover during the breach period (whichever is greater) |
| Individual (non-body corporate) | $2,500,000 | Not applicable |
The government's response to the 2023 Privacy Act Review signals major changes ahead.
The government has agreed in principle to: removing or narrowing the employee records exemption, introducing a tort for serious invasion of privacy (allowing individuals to sue for privacy breaches), strengthening consent requirements and introducing a concept of "fair and reasonable" processing, requiring privacy impact assessments for high-risk activities, introducing a children's privacy code, and creating a right to erasure (similar to the GDPR's "right to be forgotten"). These reforms will be introduced in stages. HR teams should monitor developments and start building compliance frameworks now rather than waiting for the legislation.
If the exemption is abolished, employers will need to: provide APP 5 collection notices to all employees, obtain consent for collecting sensitive information (health data, criminal record checks, diversity data), allow employees to access and correct all personal information held about them, report data breaches involving employee records to the OAIC, and apply all 13 APPs to every piece of employee data. This would be a massive operational shift for HR teams currently relying on the exemption, particularly for health and medical records, background checks, and disciplinary information.
Key figures on data breaches and privacy enforcement in Australia.