Company Name:
Reviewing Manager:
Worker Name:
Engagement Start Date:
Behavioral Control Assessment
Determine whether the company dictates the methods, processes, and procedures the worker uses to complete their tasks.
Document whether the company provides specific training on how to do the job, which suggests an employer-employee relationship.
Determine if the worker sets their own hours or if the company requires them to work specific days and times.
Assess the level of oversight, whether the worker reports to a manager, and how closely their daily activities are directed.
Evaluate whether the worker chooses the order in which they complete assignments or if the company dictates the workflow.
Financial Control Assessment
Determine if the worker receives a regular salary or hourly wage versus being paid per project, invoice, or flat fee.
Document whether the company supplies the computer, software, materials, and workspace or if the worker provides their own.
Determine if the worker can realize a profit or suffer a financial loss based on their business decisions and investments.
Assess whether the worker pays for their own business expenses like travel, supplies, and insurance without company reimbursement.
Determine if the worker has made significant investments in their own tools, office space, or equipment to perform the work.
Relationship Type Assessment
Examine the written agreement to see if it defines the relationship as employee or independent contractor and what terms govern it.
Determine if the worker receives health insurance, retirement contributions, PTO, or other benefits typically offered to employees.
Evaluate whether the engagement is open-ended and ongoing or limited to a specific project with a defined completion date.
Assess whether the work performed is a core function of the company's business or an ancillary service outside the main operations.
Determine if the worker is free to provide services to other clients simultaneously or works exclusively for the company.
IRS and Legal Standards Review
Evaluate the working relationship against the IRS common law factors covering behavioral control, financial control, and relationship type.
Check state-specific independent contractor tests such as the ABC test used in California and other jurisdictions for compliance.
Apply the Department of Labor's economic reality test to determine if the worker is economically dependent on the company.
Write a detailed memo explaining the facts, analysis, and legal reasoning supporting the worker's classification as employee or contractor.
Compliance Documentation
Obtain a completed IRS Form W-9 from every independent contractor before any payments are made for tax reporting purposes.
Prepare and distribute the appropriate tax form by the January 31 deadline based on the worker's classification for the tax year.
Ensure a signed written agreement defining the scope of work, payment terms, and independent contractor status is stored in records.
Verify that independent contractors submit invoices for their work and that payments are tracked separately from employee payroll.
Conduct a yearly review of all independent contractor engagements to confirm classifications remain accurate as relationships evolve.
Risk Mitigation
Seek advice from an employment attorney when the classification analysis is unclear or the worker's situation does not fit neatly into one category.
Review the potential financial penalties, back taxes, benefits liability, and legal consequences of incorrectly classifying a worker.
Create a standard procedure for evaluating worker classification before any new independent contractor engagement begins.
Educate managers on the differences between employees and independent contractors and the legal risks of misclassification.
Stay current on federal and state legislative changes affecting independent contractor rules and adjust practices accordingly.
It is a checklist that aids organizations in segregating employees as 1099 independent contractors or W-2 employees, as per the IRS guidelines and labor laws. In case of a misclassification, it opens up liability for unpaid benefits, penalties, and overtime. Misclassification is also one of the most common and expensive compliance mistakes that organizations tend to make. The employment classification checklist offers a clear framework for companies to make a defensible classification decision.
The Employee classification checklist is essential for companies to protect themselves from worker misclassification. The misclassification is generally observed during audits by the Department of Labor, state agencies, and IRS, resulting in penalties for overtime pay, benefits restitution, and back taxes that could sum to millions. The Employee classification checklist is essential for teams to evaluate and establish legal tests and record the classification decision, to keep the organization and the workers protected.
The employee classification checklist includes a three-factor test as per the IRS for financial and behavioral control, and relationship type. The checklist also covers state-specific ABC tests, DOL economic reality test, tax form and payment requirements, benefits eligibility determination, and contractual agreement review. It also includes the compliance documentation, benefits eligibility determination, along with aspects to monitor the existing relationship for reclassification.
You can switch between the brief and detailed classification views for both employment and independent contracting. You can modify the checklist to match the specific classification of your state, which might have stricter terms than the federal ones. You can download the checklist for free and use it to record classification and decisions for defense.
Adithyan RK is the Co-Founder and CEO of Hyring, an AI-native recruitment platform that has run over 900,000 AI interviews for companies ranging from early-stage startups to the Fortune 500. He has spent 18 years building technology businesses, starting with a digital consultancy in 2008 and a staff augmentation firm in 2017, before founding Hyring in 2022 to rebuild hiring around evidence instead of guesswork.
Expertise
Surya N is the Co-Founder and CTO of Hyring, where he architected the AI interviewing engine that has now conducted over 900,000 interviews for companies ranging from early-stage startups to the Fortune 500. A mechanical engineer who moved into artificial intelligence, he spent 6 years building AI applications inside a technology consultancy before co-founding Hyring, and wrote the first version of its AI interviewer from scratch: a system that listens, adapts its questioning in real time, and flags fraud rather than following a fixed script.
Expertise