The UK's primary anti-discrimination law that consolidates and replaces previous equality legislation, protecting individuals from unfair treatment across 9 protected characteristics in the workplace and wider society.
Key Takeaways
The Equality Act 2010 is the cornerstone of UK anti-discrimination law. It came into force on 1 October 2010 and consolidated over 116 separate provisions from earlier statutes into one piece of legislation. Before the Act, employers had to cross-reference at least nine different laws to understand their obligations. Now there's a single framework. The Act doesn't just say "don't discriminate." It defines exactly what discrimination means across six distinct types: direct discrimination, indirect discrimination, harassment, victimisation, failure to make reasonable adjustments (for disability), and discrimination arising from disability. Each type has specific legal tests that tribunals apply when hearing claims. For HR teams, the Equality Act shapes virtually every employment decision. It dictates how job adverts are worded, how interviews are conducted, how pay structures are designed, how grievances are handled, and how dismissals are managed. Getting it wrong doesn't just create legal exposure. It damages employer brand and employee trust.
Each protected characteristic has specific provisions and case law that define its scope. Understanding what each one covers is essential for writing compliant policies.
Protects employees of all ages from less favourable treatment because of their age. Unlike other characteristics, direct age discrimination can be justified if the employer shows a legitimate aim and a proportionate means of achieving it. Mandatory retirement ages are generally unlawful unless objectively justified. Common pitfalls include job adverts specifying "recent graduates" (indirect age discrimination) or refusing training to older workers because they're "close to retirement."
A person has a disability if they have a physical or mental impairment that has a substantial and long-term adverse effect on their ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities. "Long-term" means lasting or likely to last 12 months or more. Progressive conditions like cancer, HIV, and multiple sclerosis are automatically treated as disabilities from the point of diagnosis. Employers have a duty to make reasonable adjustments, which is a proactive obligation. Waiting for an employee to request adjustments isn't enough.
Protects anyone who is proposing to undergo, is undergoing, or has undergone a process to reassign their sex. No medical treatment is required. The protection applies from the moment a person proposes to transition. Absences related to gender reassignment (such as medical appointments or recovery from surgery) can't be treated less favourably than absences due to illness or other causes.
Marriage and civil partnership protection is limited to direct discrimination and doesn't extend to indirect discrimination or harassment under the Act. It protects people who are legally married or in a civil partnership, but not those who are single, divorced, or cohabiting. Pregnancy and maternity protection covers employees from the start of pregnancy through to the end of statutory maternity leave (or two weeks after birth if no leave is taken). During this protected period, any unfavourable treatment because of pregnancy or pregnancy-related illness is automatically discriminatory. No comparator is needed.
Race includes colour, nationality, ethnic origins, and national origins. Religion or belief covers organised religions, philosophical beliefs (such as environmentalism, where meeting specific criteria), and lack of belief. Sex covers men and women, and also forms the basis for equal pay claims (where a comparator of the opposite sex doing equal work receives different pay). Sexual orientation protects gay, lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual individuals. All four characteristics are protected against direct discrimination, indirect discrimination, harassment, and victimisation.
The Act defines six forms of prohibited conduct. Each has a different legal test, and understanding the distinctions matters for both prevention and defence.
| Type | Definition | Example | Defence Available? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct discrimination | Treating someone less favourably because of a protected characteristic | Not hiring a woman because she might get pregnant | Only for age (objective justification) |
| Indirect discrimination | Applying a provision, criterion, or practice that puts people sharing a characteristic at a disadvantage | Requiring all staff to work Saturdays, disadvantaging those observing a Sabbath | Yes, if a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim |
| Harassment | Unwanted conduct related to a protected characteristic that violates dignity or creates an intimidating environment | Colleagues making repeated jokes about someone's accent | Employer took all reasonable steps to prevent it |
| Victimisation | Treating someone badly because they made or supported a discrimination complaint | Passing over an employee for promotion after they gave evidence in a colleague's tribunal claim | No |
| Failure to make reasonable adjustments | Not taking steps to remove barriers for disabled employees | Refusing to allow a dyslexic employee extra time in a written assessment | Adjustment was not reasonable in the circumstances |
| Discrimination arising from disability | Treating someone unfavourably because of something arising from their disability | Dismissing an employee for absences caused by a disability-related condition | Proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim |
The Act places both reactive and proactive duties on employers. Meeting these obligations requires policies, training, and consistent decision-making across the employment lifecycle.
The Equality Act incorporates equal pay provisions (formerly the Equal Pay Act 1970), giving employees the right to equal pay for equal work regardless of sex.
Every employment contract is deemed to include a sex equality clause. This means that if a woman is doing equal work to a male comparator (or vice versa), they're entitled to equally favourable contract terms. Equal work covers three categories: like work (same or broadly similar), work rated as equivalent (under a job evaluation scheme), and work of equal value (different work but equal in demands). An employer can defend a pay difference by showing it's due to a material factor that isn't directly or indirectly discriminatory, such as length of service, location weighting, or market forces.
Employers with 250 or more employees must publish six gender pay gap metrics annually: mean and median gender pay gaps, mean and median bonus pay gaps, the proportion of men and women receiving bonuses, and the proportion of men and women in each pay quartile. Reports must be published on the employer's own website and the government's online service. As of 2024, the UK's national median gender pay gap stood at 13.1% (ONS). While there's no legal penalty for having a gap, failing to publish on time can result in enforcement action by the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC).
The Act permits positive action but prohibits positive discrimination. The distinction is critical for employers trying to improve workplace diversity without breaking the law.
Sections 158 and 159 permit employers to take proportionate steps to help people who share a protected characteristic to overcome disadvantage, participate more fully, or meet specific needs. Examples include targeted outreach to underrepresented groups, offering mentoring or training programmes, and using the "tiebreaker" provision at the recruitment stage (choosing a candidate from an underrepresented group over an equally qualified candidate). Positive action must be proportionate and time-limited. Employers should collect data to show that the target group is genuinely underrepresented or disadvantaged before implementing any measures.
Treating someone more favourably simply because of a protected characteristic remains unlawful. Quotas, reserved positions, and automatic preferences are prohibited. The only exception is for disability: employers can lawfully treat disabled candidates more favourably than non-disabled candidates (section 13(3)). For example, guaranteed interview schemes for disabled applicants are lawful.
When an employee believes they've been discriminated against, the Equality Act provides a clear enforcement route through employment tribunals.
Claims must normally be brought within 3 months (less one day) of the act complained of. Before filing a tribunal claim, the employee must contact ACAS for early conciliation, which pauses the clock for up to 6 weeks. The burden of proof shifts once the claimant establishes facts from which discrimination could be inferred. At that point, the employer must prove the treatment was not discriminatory. This is a lower threshold than in most civil litigation.
Tribunals can award: a declaration of rights, a recommendation (requiring the employer to take specific action), and compensation. Compensation for discrimination is uncapped and includes financial losses, injury to feelings (using the Vento bands: lower band GBP 1,100 to GBP 11,200, middle band GBP 11,200 to GBP 33,700, upper band GBP 33,700 to GBP 56,200 as of April 2024), and aggravated damages in exceptional cases. The median award for disability discrimination in 2023/24 was GBP 18,000. Maximum awards have exceeded GBP 1 million in high-profile cases.
Data showing the scale and impact of discrimination claims and enforcement in the UK.
The Equality Act continues to evolve through case law, secondary legislation, and proposed reforms.
From October 2024, employers have a new positive duty to take reasonable steps to prevent sexual harassment in the workplace. This isn't just about responding to complaints. Employers must proactively assess risks and put preventive measures in place. The EHRC can take enforcement action against employers who fail in this duty. This builds on earlier provisions by shifting from a complaints-based approach to a prevention-based one.
While menopause isn't a standalone protected characteristic, tribunal claims related to menopause symptoms have risen significantly. Claims are typically brought under disability, sex, or age discrimination. In Rooney v Leicester City Council (2022), the tribunal found that menopausal symptoms can amount to a disability where they're sufficiently long-term and substantial. Employers are increasingly introducing menopause policies and training managers on making workplace adjustments.
The government has consulted on mandatory ethnicity pay gap reporting, similar to gender pay gap obligations. As of 2026, reporting remains voluntary, but many large employers publish ethnicity pay data proactively. HR teams should prepare data collection systems for when mandatory reporting becomes law.