
Willo VS Hyring
Willo
vsHyring
A Detailed Comparison
Written on: 18 Feb 2026
Last updated: 18 Feb 2026

Written by
Team Hyring

Fact Checked by
Adithyan RK

Table of Contents
1.An Overview
2.Why teams switch from Willo to Hyring
3.Willo vs Hyring: Metrics Comparison
4.Ecosystem: Products & Hiring Workflow
5.Willo vs Hyring: Feature Comparison At A Glance
6.Willo vs Hyring: A Detailed Features Comparison
•Conversational AI Interviewing
•Interview Integrity Monitoring
•Scoring and Fairness
•Assessment Types and Coverage
•Scheduling and Automation
•Reporting & Analytics
•Global Hiring and Language Support
•The Human Touch: Willo vs Hyring
7.UI/UX Experience: Willo vs Hyring
•Recruiter Experience
•Candidate Experience
8.Security and Compliance: Willo vs Hyring
9.Cost & Pricing Structure
10.Client Testimonials
11.Summary: Which is the Better AI Interviewer – Willo or Hyring?
12.Frequently Asked Questions
An Overview
Willo is a recruitment tool that gets rid of long phone calls and uses video interviews instead. Recruiters don't need to worry about scheduling or time zones; they just watch candidate video responses whenever they like.
Hyring is a tool built to assist recruiters. Its scope is much bigger. Along with conducting video interviews, it also does automatic phone screens, uses AI for screening resumes, conducts live coding tests, and uses scoring systems to generate candidate reports.
Why teams switch from Willo to Hyring
Automation that works well:
Hyring automates the whole hiring process, from screening resumes to conducting video and phone interviews, and evaluating candidate responses. Everything works together smoothly. Candidates can go through the process at their own pace, and recruiters get neat summaries of their information instead of just raw data. This is very helpful if you are hiring for high-volume positions or reviewing a large number of candidates.
Willo lets candidates record video answers to questions recruiters preset without the inconvenience of scheduling and time zones. Recruiters can then watch the responses later. For other early-stage processes, like screening resumes and evaluating skills, recruiters will need to do it themselves or use another tool.
Recruiter Friendly:
Hyring completely automates the entire first-stage screening and interview process for recruiters. So, instead of piecing together different bits of information, recruiters get a full view of each candidate in one place. Videos, transcripts from interviews, and AI analysis are all combined. It's like having a personal assistant who has summarized everything and highlighted what matters most. This is great, especially when hiring teams need to make quick decisions or look at many candidates without watching hours of videos.
Willo takes away the recruiter's labor in conducting interviews. They can watch the interview recordings and make their own judgments. This gives hiring teams full control and helps notice things that might be missed by AI, but this makes the hiring process longer.
Handling High-Volumes:
Hyring is made to manage a lot of candidates. When recruiters upload a large number of candidates, or deadlines are approaching, Hyring keeps working. The AI handles the first round of screenings, so recruiters can focus primarily on sourcing, without needing extra recruiters. It’s built to keep going, even when hiring gets busy.
Willo records interviews, but reviewing them takes time. As the number of applicants grows, recruiters still need to watch, evaluate, and compare each video interview themselves. This works well for smaller hiring needs, but if teams need to hire for high-volume roles, the process can take time.
Teams that move from Willo to Hyring aren’t unhappy with video interviews. They just want more. Willo does video interviews very well. However, teams looking to simplify their tools, automate more of the screening process, and speed up hiring without losing quality will prefer Hyring.
Willo vs Hyring: Metrics Comparison
Ratings change over time. Review live pages for the latest updates.
Ecosystem: Products & Hiring Workflow
This section discusses Willo and Hyring and how they can help hiring teams with their hiring process. Both recruitment tools are smart additions for first interviews.
Hyring Review
Product Ecosystem
Hyring is an AI recruitment tool that helps enterprises find and evaluate job candidates quickly. It uses different AI tools like resume screeners, phone interviews, video interviews, and coding tests to filter candidates early in the hiring process.
AI Resume Screener
Looks at resumes against job requirements and checks if they are aligned.
AI Phone Screener
AI Video Interviewer
AI Coding Interviewer
English Proficiency Testing
Hyring works well to help recruiters filter and choose candidates based on specific job needs.
Hyring Workflow
Hyring makes recruitment easier by using AI to get applicants with the respective job requirements, with little to no input from recruiters.
Brief
Hyring is designed to quicken hiring decisions and save recruiters time, especially for companies with high-volume hiring. Reviews from G2, Capterra, and Trustpilot highlight its efficiency while providing a good experience for candidates.
- Easy-to-use interface
- AI coding interviews for technical roles
- English tests for workplace communication
- Automated resume and phone screening saves time for recruiters
- Strong cheating prevention with real-time monitoring
- Flexible pricing for any team size
- Lack of identity checks
- AI interviews may feel less personal
TAKEAWAY
Hyring is made to reduce recruiter workload and speed up the hiring process. Its main strength is its automation, with its resume screeners, AI phone screeners, video interviews, coding assessments, and getting detailed reports that help shortlist candidates quickly.
Willo Review
Product Ecosystem
Willo is a video interview tool that lets recruiters feed in questions and then lets candidates attend interviews without the worry of scheduling. Recruiters can just send a link, and candidates can record their answers when it fits their schedule, and hiring teams can evaluate candidates when it works for them based on the responses.
Asynchronous virtual interviews
One-way interviews with pre-recorded questions set by the hiring team. Candidates respond on their own schedule.
Candidate Filtering
AI Summaries
Feedback Emails
Follow-up Questions
Willo helps remove scheduling issues and makes it easier to assess candidates without complicating any established hiring process.
Willo Workflow
Willo is an AI tool to help screen candidates, not the whole hiring process. It’s useful for the early screening processes or interviewing candidates in different time zones.
Brief
Willo is an AI interviewing tool that helps hiring teams communicate with candidates more effectively at the start of the hiring process. It does not replace hiring teams or make hiring decisions; instead, it solves specific problems like scheduling issues and repetitive first interviews.
- Reduces recruiter back and forth to schedule interviews
- Candidates are allowed to respond in different modes (video, audio, text)
- Questions are standardized for everyone
- Minimal automated evaluation
- A higher number of candidates means more time needed for reviews
TAKEAWAY
Willo is ideal for teams wanting to refresh their first interviews without completely changing their hiring system. It's excellent for screening and teamwork, but it's not an end-to-end recruitment tool.
Bottom Line
Hyring is made to reduce recruiter workload and speed up the hiring process. Its main strength is its automation, with its resume screeners, <a href="https://hyring.com/ai-phone-screener" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-blue-700">AI phone screeners</a>, video interviews, coding assessments, and getting detailed reports that help shortlist candidates quickly.

Quick screening, keeping interviews on track, and making fast hiring decisions.
Initial candidate filtration and asynchronous interviews, reducing recruiters' workload.
Both tools are good at what they do, but they focus on different things. Hyring is all about speed and efficiency. Willo focuses on standardization.
Willo vs Hyring: Feature Comparison At A Glance
Conversational AI interviewing
(dynamic, two-way)
Dynamic follow-up questions
Partially, Willo Intelligence can generate interview and follow-up questions.
Candidate authenticity & remote proctoring
Liveness Checks & Proctoring
Coding & role-based assessments
Language & communication testing
-
Automated scheduling/calendar sync
Hiring analytics & reports
ATS / HRIS integrations & public API
SOC2 & ISO 27001 enterprise security
Partially, ISO 27001 is stated
(including ISO 27001:2022 in security documentation), but SOC 2 is not mentioned.
Custom branding & candidate experience
Accessibility & global support
Support & onboarding
(SLA, Account Manager, training)
As audited on 18 Feb 2026.
Willo vs Hyring: A Detailed Features Comparison
Conversational AI Interviewing


Hyring
Hyring is an AI tool that helps automate screening and the first rounds for interviews. It acts like a virtual hiring manager that interviews candidates and creates a report. Hiring has an AI-Twin feature, where avatars can be set according to those who work in the company, and the avatar will mimic the human's face and voice while conducting the interview.
Willo
Willo, on the other hand, uses pre-recorded, one-way interviews. Recruiters set the questions, send them to candidates, and they respond as per their schedule. There’s no human conversation, and the questions are standardized for everyone.

Hyring is a better alternative to Willo if you want AI to conduct interviews with the feeling of a human conducting them. Willo does not have much human interaction, but is good for structured screening.
Interview Integrity Monitoring


Hyring
Hyring takes interview integrity very seriously. Its AI keeps an eye on the interview to catch any signs of cheating, like candidates looking away or having others in the frame. It flags these problems for recruiters to review.
Willo
Willo has identity checks and also takes proctoring interviews seriously, but it doesn't monitor as closely as Hyring.

Hyring has a better and more rigid anti-cheating process set. Willo also proctors interviews but is less thorough.
Scoring and Fairness


Hyring
Hyring gives hiring teams detailed candidate reports with videos, transcripts with time stamps, scores, and candidate rankings.
Willo
Willo doesn't evaluate or score candidates; it gives recruiters their raw responses, and they, in turn, decide how to evaluate them.

Hyring's reports are more hiring manager-friendly and more actionable to evaluate candidates. Willo is more manual.
Assessment Types and Coverage


Hyring
Hyring offers recruiters several ways to evaluate candidates. It offers assessments, like resume screening, phone interviews, and other tests. Recruiters can choose how to evaluate candidates based on the job requirements.
Willo
Willo only does basic filtering and asynchronous interviews, without resume screening or tests.

Hyring offers hiring teams a wider assessment range to evaluate candidates. Willo focuses on filtering and interviewing candidates.
Scheduling and Automation


Hyring
Hyring is built on automation and scheduling. It helps with scheduling, allowing candidates to interview on their own time without the back and forth of recruiters to pick a time. All processes are automated with Hyring. From the resume screening to the AI interviews, the tool takes care of the hiring process with candidate evaluation ready for the team.
Willo
Willo also helps with scheduling for the first rounds of interviews, but doesn't automate the whole hiring process.

Hyring is a better alternative to Willo for complete early-stage automation. Willo helps schedule and conduct interviews.
Reporting and Analytics


Hyring
Hyring provides full, detailed reports with recordings, transcripts, scores, and any signs of cheating, all with timestamps. This helps recruiters quickly gauge if a candidate is suitable for the role or not.
Willo
Willo has options to review and export reports, but its reporting isn't as detailed.

Hyring is a good alternative to Willo if you want complete reports that are action-ready. Willo offers simpler reports.
Global Hiring and Language Support


Hyring
Hyring supports global hiring by offering more than 10 languages, making it easy to recruit globally.
Willo
Willo also supports multiple languages and is focused on accessibility, but it doesn't specify how many languages it supports.

Hyring is a lot more transparent about language support for global recruitment, making it a good alternative to Willo.
The Human Touch: Willo vs Hyring


Hyring
Hyring mimics the hiring pipeline that recruiters use with AI. The AI asks questions based on the job role, listens, and asks follow-up questions like a human would. It doesn’t aim to replace human recruiters; instead, it automates the monotonous initial rounds so recruiters can focus on more important tasks. The AI handles the hard work, and the hiring team makes the final decision.
Willo
Willo takes a different route; it doesn’t try to act like a recruiter or have live chats. Instead, it allows candidates to record their answers whenever they want, without any pressure from a live audience. Hiring teams can watch these responses later at their discretion.

Choose Hyring if you want your interviews to feel personal and conversational, even when screening many candidates. Its AI is trained to replace early recruiter calls while still feeling like a conversation.Choose Willo if you care more about giving candidates a relaxed experience and letting your team carefully review responses. It’s best for reducing stress in early interviews and helping your team make thoughtful evaluations without AI managing the conversation.
UI/UX Experience: Willo vs Hyring
Recruiter Experience


Hyring
Hyring is quick and easy to use for recruiters. It has a simple dashboard that lets recruiters start interviews immediately. It supports a variety of interviews, like video and phone calls, and many more. Recruiters can easily customize their dashboard and interviews with ready-made templates and questions, needing very little setup time.
Willo
Willo’s dashboard makes screening interviews more organized. It uses interview templates that recruiters can create once and use again for different jobs. Willo also has customizable scorecards that can be shared with the hiring team for consistency.

Choose Hyring if you need a tool that can handle multiple screening steps (like resume screening and interviews) with organized and detailed reports for quicker decision making. Choose Willo if you need a tool that focuses on one-way screening interviews, allows you to reuse templates, and doesn’t change your current process much.
Candidate Experience


Hyring
Hyring makes interviewing an easy and comfortable process for candidates. They receive a link to attend the interview, and the system and AI take care of everything else.
Willo
Willo is simple for candidates to use, too. It works well on mobile devices and doesn’t always need a desktop computer.

Willo is better for its accessibility; it's mobile-friendly and only requires candidates to complete the interview. For hiring teams that want efficiency in the screening processes (not just video interviews), Hyring is often the better alternative to Willo since it helps guide candidates through multiple steps while keeping everything organized for recruiters.
Security and Compliance: Willo vs Hyring
Data Protection
Data security stack graphic: AWS cloud icon, encryption lock, role-based access silhouette, consent checkbox, retention/deletion timer. Keep it generic (no vendor logos if you want to stay safe legally).


Hyring
Hyring's privacy policy is up-to-date and complies with all industry standards. It regularly checks its security and is working hard to fully meet GDPR, SOC 2 Type 2, and ISO 27001 standards.
Willo
Willo's privacy policy is also air-tight as it handles data according to GDPR. It processes candidate data with consent and customer data through contracts. It stores all data in AWS, encrypts it, and limits access only to those who need it for work, all under confidentiality agreements.

Willo gives clearer details on how they protect candidate and recruiter data, including where it is stored and how it is secured. Hyring shares more about the security standards they meet.
Compliance & Certifications


Hyring
Hyring has all the necessary certifications and is working towards full compliance with GDPR, SOC 2 Type 2, and ISO 27001.
Willo
Willo also complies with ISO 27001:2022 and explains how candidate and recruiter data is protected during any transfer. Willo’s privacy policy also covers GDPR rules and details what happens in case of a data breach.

If SOC 2 Type 2 compliance is a priority, Hyring is a better alternative to Willo. If you want detailed information on encryption and compliance, Willo provides more insight.
Candidate Privacy


Hyring
Hyring's privacy policy emphasizes their security checks and candidate privacy regarding data rights, consent, and how long they keep data. All candidate data is given to only those who have the authorization to it, and candidates are well informed about this as well.
Willo
Willo is clear about the fact that it doesn't share any personal data without consent. Their policy on storing data states that they delete or anonymize it when it's no longer needed, and they can change how long they keep it based on recruiter needs.

Willo is a lot more transparent about how they handle candidate privacy on a daily basis, including consent and data deletion. Hyring is more open about their commitment to formal compliance standards.
Cost & Pricing Structure
Hyring:
Hyring makes pricing easy to understand for enterprises. They use a credit system where each plan gives you a set number of credits. Their prices start at $5 per interview and can go as low as $1 per interview if it is a high-volume role.
Annual plans (monthly price, billed yearly):
Lite: $99/month - 20 credits
Starter: $299/month - 70 credits
Growth: $1,999/month - 600 credits
Pro: $4,999/month - 5,000 credits
Enterprise: Custom pricing
Cost per interview (based on annual plans):
Lite: $99 ÷ 20 = $4.95 per credit
Starter: $299 ÷ 70 ≈ $4.27 per credit
Growth: $1,999 ÷ 600 ≈ $3.33 per credit
Pro: $4,999 ÷ 5,000 ≈ $1.00 per credit
The good thing is that companies can easily see how much they'll have to pay without consulting the sales team. This makes forecasting the budget easier.
Willo does pricing a little differently. Their pricing is not based on how many interviews you have. Instead, it depends on your company's size and hiring needs. They offer flexible monthly plans based on different levels like Growth, Scale, and Enterprise.
Pricing model
Hyring:
Hyring makes pricing easy to understand for enterprises. They use a credit system where each plan gives you a set number of credits. Their prices start at $5 per interview and can go as low as $1 per interview if it is a high-volume role.
Annual plans (monthly price, billed yearly):
Lite: $99/month - 20 credits
Starter: $299/month - 70 credits
Growth: $1,999/month - 600 credits
Pro: $4,999/month - 5,000 credits
Enterprise: Custom pricing
Cost per interview (based on annual plans):
Lite: $99 ÷ 20 = $4.95 per credit
Starter: $299 ÷ 70 ≈ $4.27 per credit
Growth: $1,999 ÷ 600 ≈ $3.33 per credit
Pro: $4,999 ÷ 5,000 ≈ $1.00 per credit
The good thing is that companies can easily see how much they'll have to pay without consulting the sales team. This makes forecasting the budget easier.
Willo does pricing a little differently. Their pricing is not based on how many interviews you have. Instead, it depends on your company's size and hiring needs. They offer flexible monthly plans based on different levels like Growth, Scale, and Enterprise.
If companies want a simple and transparent budget, Hyring is easier to understand. It operates on a credit system and clearly shows how much credit is and what the process costs in credits. Willo’s prices are based on the size of the company, making budgeting a little difficult for companies.
If companies want a simple and transparent budget, Hyring is easier to understand. Willo's prices are based on the size of the company, making budgeting more complex. You can further look at Hyring's pricing structure and request a consultation at Hyring Subscription Plans.
Client testimonials
We cut phone screens by 60% after rolling out structured AI screening. Recruiters could focus on higher-value interviews.
Mid-market
Tech recruiter
Summary: Which is the Better AI Interviewer – Willo or Hyring?
When making a choice between Willo and Hyring, it is important to understand that most hiring teams struggle with the first rounds of interviews.

Why Hyring is good for many teams:
Hyring is for teams that need more than just interviews. It combines everything, from AI resume screening, phone interviews, video interviews, coding tests, and English Proficiency test. It also gives recruiters scores, recordings, transcripts, and reports, making it easy to shortlist candidates. Hyring has simple pricing, with costs as low as $1 per interview if you're hiring in bulk.
Choose Hyring if
You want one system to manage the entire early hiring process, from screening to interviewing and reporting.
Why Willo is good for many teams:
Willo allows candidates to do interviews on video, audio, or text when it suits them, instead of having phone calls. The hiring team can also review applications at their own convenience. If your hiring system is working well and you just want to improve early interviews, Willo is a good option.
Choose Willo if
You want an easy, candidate-friendly way to do first-round interviews that easily integrates into your current system.
When looking for an alternative to Willo, consider what your company needs. Willo is great for asynchronous screening, while Hyring can manage more than just the first interview.
Disclaimer: Information is sourced from public records and is subject to change. This comparison does not constitute a guarantee of current service offerings or specifications.
Frequently Asked Questions
Hyring is an AI recruitment software that helps recruiters interview and evaluate candidates, providing detailed reports to help speed up hiring.
Willo is a video interview platform that collects candidate responses at scale. In simple terms, Willo collects answers, while Hyring interviews and analyzes them.
No, both tools cannot replace human recruiters, and neither claims to do so. Hyring and Willo are designed to make early-stage hiring easier and save time, not to take over human judgment. Hyring uses AI to sort candidates and gives structured data for review, while Willo helps avoid scheduling issues and summarizes responses, allowing recruiters to focus on important candidates.
Hyring and Willo easily connect with Greenhouse, Workday, and other popular ATS systems. Hyring goes the extra mile and can integrate with Slack and WhatsApp as well, making workflow easier. If you want easy integration, choose Willo. If you prefer integration with ATS systems, Slack, and WhatsApp, go for Hyring.
Neither Hyring nor Willo directly connects with LinkedIn Recruiter. Recruiters usually source candidates on different job boards, including LinkedIn Recruiter, and bulk upload them onto the platform.
If LinkedIn Recruiter is your primary mode of sourcing, Hyring compliments it perfectly.
Yes, both platforms support interviews in different languages apart from English. Hyring supports 10+ languages, including Spanish and Mandarin, and its AI adjusts itself for scoring. Willo works with 18 languages and offers translation for candidates. For scoring in multiple languages, Hyring provides clear guidelines.
Hyring is better for roles like software engineering as it offers coding interviews and technical assessments. For sales and non-technical roles, both tools are effective. Willo is good for screening many candidates, while Hyring provides structured scoring for communication skills.
Hyring is made for technical evaluations with coding reports and scoring. Willo summarizes answers but is more of a screening tool.
Both tools can handle large hiring needs, but in their own ways. Willo is great for quickly sending interviews to many candidates. Hyring also manages high-volume hiring while maintaining quality in scoring and technical evaluation.
Hyring has stronger anti-cheating measures, such as detecting any suspicious behavior in real-time. Willo also follows anti-cheat measures, but is not as comprehensive as Hyring. For strict monitoring, Hyring is the better alternative to Willo.
Hyring provides in-depth reports with several scores and detailed analysis. Willo gives AI summaries and scorecards. Both are useful, but Hyring's reports are more comprehensive and actionable.
Yes, both can do live video interviews. Hyring offers both live and async options, while Willo mainly does async but can schedule live interviews.
Hyring's support team works around the clock to help with integration and assessment setup. Willo's customer support helps simplify the setup process and answer any other questions customers can have.
While there is no direct way to measure candidate preference, Hyring has a rating of 4.9/5 on G2, while Willo has a rating of 4.7/5. Candidates have mixed feelings; some like the flexibility of async interviews, while others find one-way video interviews uncomfortable. Hyring aims to make interviews feel more human, which can ease candidate anxiety.
Hyring provides a detailed candidate report with scores for skills, communication, integrity signals like switching tabs or plagiarism, ratings for skills with details on each ability, clarity, confidence, knowledge, and problem-solving skills. Each report will also include the full interview audio with a time-stamped transcript, and you can download the whole report as a PDF with all scores and monitoring data.
Willo's interview reports show recorded answers from candidates, with help from AI. Each report includes candidate answers in video, audio, or text format. Willo also provides scorecards to rate candidates and lets you save results in CSV format for chosen candidates. In short, Willo gives you recorded answers, transcripts, and summaries to make your evaluation process faster.
Neither recruitment tool can specifically detect third-party tools, but both platforms can detect behaviors linked to them. Hyring's detailed monitoring is more effective at spotting any kind of cheating.
Willo is better at finding rehearsed or AI-written answers during async screening. For critical roles where honesty is key, Hyring offers more reliable monitoring.
