A federal law enacted in 2008 that prohibits discrimination in employment and health insurance based on genetic information, including DNA test results, family medical history, and participation in genetic testing or counseling services.
Key Takeaways
Congress passed GINA in 2008 to address a growing fear: that advances in genetic science would create a new form of discrimination. As genetic testing became cheaper and more accessible, the concern was that employers and insurers would use genetic information to screen out people predisposed to costly medical conditions. An employer might refuse to hire someone whose family history showed Huntington's disease. An insurer might deny coverage based on a BRCA gene mutation indicating elevated cancer risk. GINA drew a clear line. Genetic information can't be used against you in employment or health insurance. The law passed the Senate 95-0 and the House 414-1, reflecting rare bipartisan agreement. Senator Ted Kennedy called it "the first major new civil rights bill of the new century." GINA matters more today than when it was enacted. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing has exploded. Over 40 million Americans have sent saliva samples to companies like 23andMe and AncestryDNA. Employers running wellness programs increasingly ask health-risk questions that brush up against GINA's boundaries. And as genetic science moves from predicting disease risk to correlating genes with traits like intelligence, endurance, or stress tolerance, the potential for misuse in employment grows.
Title II is the section most relevant to HR professionals. It governs how employers handle genetic information.
Employers can't use genetic information to make decisions about hiring, firing, promotions, pay, job assignments, training, or any other term or condition of employment. They can't request, require, or purchase genetic information about employees or applicants. They can't retaliate against employees who file GINA complaints, participate in investigations, or oppose practices they believe violate the law. They can't harass employees based on genetic information to the point of creating a hostile work environment.
The definition is broader than most people expect. It includes the results of an individual's genetic tests (DNA, RNA, chromosomes, proteins, metabolites). It includes genetic tests of family members (spouse, children, parents, siblings, grandparents, great-grandparents, uncles, aunts, nieces, nephews, and first cousins). It includes family medical history, which the EEOC defines as information about the manifestation of disease or disorder in family members. It includes requests for or receipt of genetic services (testing, counseling, education). And it includes the genetic information of a fetus carried by the individual or family member, or an embryo legally held by the individual using assisted reproductive technology.
GINA recognizes that employers sometimes learn genetic information inadvertently: an employee mentions their mother's cancer diagnosis at lunch, or a supervisor overhears a conversation about genetic testing. This isn't a violation. The law includes a "water cooler" exception for genetic information acquired through casual conversation, as long as the employer didn't ask probing follow-up questions. However, once the employer has the information, it can't be used for employment decisions. The safest approach: if an employee volunteers genetic or family medical history, don't ask follow-up questions and don't record the information in personnel files.
Title I prevents health insurers and employer-sponsored group health plans from using genetic information for underwriting decisions.
Group health plans and insurers can't use genetic information to determine eligibility, set premiums, or impose preexisting condition exclusions. They can't require genetic testing as a condition of enrollment. They can't request or require that individuals or family members undergo genetic tests. These protections apply to both fully insured and self-funded employer health plans.
GINA Title I doesn't apply to life insurance, disability insurance, or long-term care insurance. Those insurers can still use genetic information in underwriting decisions, though some states have passed laws extending genetic nondiscrimination to these insurance types. It also doesn't restrict the military's use of genetic information for fitness-for-duty determinations. And it doesn't apply to employers with fewer than 15 employees (for the employment provisions) or to health plans that aren't employer-sponsored group plans.
Wellness programs are the most common area where employers accidentally violate GINA. Health risk assessments, biometric screenings, and family medical history questionnaires all raise GINA issues.
Wellness programs can collect genetic information (including family medical history through health risk assessments) only if participation is truly voluntary. The employer can't require participation, can't penalize employees who decline, and can't deny access to health coverage or benefits based on refusal to participate. If the program collects genetic information, the employer must provide a written notice explaining what information is being collected, how it will be used, who will see it, and the restrictions on disclosure. Individualized genetic information can't be shared with the employer. Only aggregate, de-identified data can be reported back.
In 2016, the EEOC issued final rules clarifying GINA's application to wellness programs, allowing financial incentives of up to 30% of the cost of employee-only coverage for completing health risk assessments that include spousal medical history. However, the AARP challenged these rules in AARP v. EEOC (2017), and a federal court vacated the incentive rules in 2019. As of 2024, the EEOC hasn't issued replacement rules, creating uncertainty about what incentive levels are permissible. The safest practice: keep wellness program incentives modest and ensure participation is genuinely voluntary.
GINA and the ADA protect different things, and the line between them matters for HR compliance.
| Factor | GINA | ADA |
|---|---|---|
| What it protects | Genetic predispositions and family medical history | Current disabilities and medical conditions |
| When it applies | Before a condition manifests | After a condition is diagnosed or manifests |
| Employer obligations | Don't acquire, don't use, don't disclose | Provide reasonable accommodations, engage in interactive process |
| Information handling | Can't request genetic info (with narrow exceptions) | Can request medical documentation to verify disability and determine accommodations |
| Example | Employee has BRCA gene mutation (elevated cancer risk) | Employee is diagnosed with breast cancer and needs treatment leave |
GINA is enforced through the EEOC (Title II) and HHS/state insurance departments (Title I).
Employees file charges with the EEOC within 180 days (300 days in states with a fair employment practices agency). The EEOC investigates and may pursue conciliation or litigation. Available remedies include back pay, front pay, compensatory damages (emotional distress), punitive damages, injunctive relief, and attorney's fees. Compensatory and punitive damages are capped based on employer size: $50,000 (15-100 employees), $100,000 (101-200), $200,000 (201-500), and $300,000 (501+). In 2023, the EEOC received 415 charges alleging genetic information discrimination.
EEOC v. Fabricut Inc. (2013): the first GINA lawsuit by the EEOC, settled for $50,000 after the employer requested family medical history during a post-offer medical exam. EEOC v. Founders Pavilion (2014): $370,000 settlement after a nursing home requested genetic information from employees. EEOC v. BNV Home Care Agency (2014): employer ordered DNA testing of employees to investigate a workplace incident, resulting in an $82,500 settlement. These cases demonstrate that even well-intentioned requests for genetic information can violate the law.
Most GINA violations happen because HR professionals or managers don't realize they're collecting genetic information.
Data on GINA charges and the growing relevance of genetic privacy in the workplace.