The prevalent 90-day notice period practice in India's IT and professional services sectors, rooted in employment contracts and the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act.
Key Takeaways
In India's IT and professional services sector, a 90-day notice period has become the de facto standard for mid-level and senior employees. This means that when an employee resigns, they must continue working for 90 calendar days before their last working day, unless the employer agrees to an earlier release or the employee pays salary in lieu of the unserved notice. This practice is unusual by global standards. The US has no mandatory notice period. The UK's statutory notice caps at 12 weeks. Most European countries range from 1 to 3 months. India's 90-day norm makes it one of the longest notice periods anywhere. The origins are practical. India's IT sector grew rapidly in the 2000s and 2010s, with attrition rates consistently above 20% per year. Companies adopted long notice periods as a retention mechanism: making it harder and more expensive for employees to leave. NASSCOM's 2024 technology sector HR report found that 67% of Indian IT companies mandate 90-day notice for employees at the experienced (3+ years) level. At the senior management level, some companies extend it to 180 days.
There is no Indian labor law that specifically mandates a 90-day notice period. The legal basis is contractual. Under the Indian Contract Act, 1872, an employment contract is a valid agreement between two parties. If both the employer and employee agree to a 90-day notice clause at the time of hiring, it's enforceable. The Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 applies to establishments with 100+ workers and allows employers to define notice terms in their standing orders. The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 sets a minimum notice of 1 month for workmen who've completed 1+ year of service, but this applies to "workmen" (a specific legal category that typically excludes IT professionals, managers, and white-collar workers). For most IT employees, the employment contract governs the notice period, not statute.
The 90-day notice typically applies to employees at or above a certain experience level or grade. Entry-level hires (0 to 2 years of experience) usually have 30-day notice periods. Mid-level employees (2 to 7 years) may have 60 to 90 days. Senior employees (7+ years) and management-level roles almost universally have 90 days. Some companies apply a uniform 90-day notice to all employees regardless of level. Major IT companies like TCS, Infosys, Wipro, HCL, and Tech Mahindra all use 90-day notice periods for experienced hires. Product companies (Google India, Microsoft India, Amazon India) tend to have shorter notice periods of 30 to 60 days.
A notice period buyout allows the employee to leave before completing the full notice period by paying the employer an amount equal to the salary for the unserved portion.
If an employee on a 90-day notice wants to leave after 30 days, they owe the employer 60 days' salary. This is typically deducted from the full-and-final settlement (the final payout of salary, accrued leave, and other entitlements). Alternatively, the employee pays the amount directly. The calculation is usually based on gross salary, including basic pay, HRA, and fixed allowances. Variable pay (bonuses, commissions) is typically excluded. For a mid-level IT professional earning INR 15 LPA (roughly INR 1.25 lakh/month), a full 90-day buyout costs approximately INR 3.75 lakh.
Here's the catch: the employer isn't always required to accept a buyout. Many Indian IT companies reserve the right to accept or reject a buyout request at their discretion. Some companies accept buyouts only if a replacement has been identified. Others have a blanket policy of not accepting buyouts for employees in critical projects or client-facing roles. The employment contract typically specifies whether buyout is an option. If the contract says "the company may, at its sole discretion, accept payment in lieu of notice," the employee can't force an early exit by paying money. They need the company's agreement.
For the employee paying the buyout: the amount is typically deducted from the full-and-final settlement and not separately taxable (it reduces the total taxable payout). For the employer receiving the buyout: it's treated as income. When the new employer pays the buyout on behalf of the employee (some companies offer this as a signing benefit), the payment is treated as a perquisite and taxed accordingly. Consult a tax advisor for the specific treatment, as the Income Tax Act's interpretation has varied across assessment years.
While the 90-day notice period benefits employers by providing transition time, it creates significant problems for employees, hiring companies, and the broader talent market.
When a company extends an offer to a candidate who has a 90-day notice period, the hiring timeline extends to 3+ months from offer acceptance to the candidate's first day. During this window, the position remains unfilled, projects slow down, and the risk of offer dropout increases dramatically. LinkedIn India's 2024 hiring data shows that offer dropout rates for candidates with 90-day notice periods are 35% higher than for candidates with 30-day notice periods. Three months is a long time. The candidate may receive counter-offers, better offers from other companies, or simply change their mind.
A 90-day notice period acts as a golden handcuff that limits employee mobility. Employees who want to change jobs face a 3-month transition period during which they're working for a company they've mentally checked out of. Productivity drops. Engagement drops. The employee does the minimum required while counting down days. This isn't good for anyone: not the employee, not the current employer, and not the team. It also disproportionately affects employees in competitive hiring markets. If a startup wants to hire an engineer from Infosys, they must wait 90 days while the engineer serves notice. Many startups can't wait that long and hire someone else.
Long notice periods create an extended window for counter-offers. The current employer has 90 days to convince the employee to stay. This leads to a predictable cycle: employee resigns, company counter-offers with a salary hike or promotion, employee accepts the counter-offer, employee regrets the decision and starts looking again within a year. NASSCOM's data shows that 50% of employees who accept counter-offers in Indian IT companies leave within 12 months anyway. The 90-day notice period doesn't prevent attrition; it just delays it and adds a counter-offer dance in between.
Employees and hiring managers both have strategies to work within or around the 90-day notice period.
Start by reading your employment contract carefully. Understand whether buyout is available and whether the company can reject it. Then approach your manager or HR with a clear request: specify the date you want to be released and explain why (without disclosing your new employer if you prefer not to). Offer to complete knowledge transfer and documentation within the shorter window. Many managers will agree to an early release if the transition is handled professionally. The formal request should be in writing (email to HR and manager). Common negotiation levers: offering to be available for questions after leaving (informally), completing all pending deliverables before release, and training a replacement within the shorter period.
If you're hiring a candidate with a 90-day notice, have a plan. Option 1: wait. Build the 90-day window into your hiring timeline. Start the search 4 to 5 months before you need someone. Option 2: offer notice period buyout as part of the compensation package. Include it in the offer letter as a one-time signing benefit. Option 3: negotiate a phased start. The candidate joins part-time or as a consultant during their notice period (this requires legal review to ensure it doesn't violate the current employment contract). Option 4: target candidates at companies with shorter notice periods. Product companies, startups, and non-IT firms often have 30-day notices.
Indian companies are more likely to agree to early release in these situations: the employee has been backfilled or the role is being eliminated, the employee is not on a critical project or client engagement, the relationship between the employee and company is positive, the team has capacity to absorb the knowledge transfer quickly, and the HR team is pragmatic about retaining disengaged employees. Companies are less likely to agree when the employee holds critical project knowledge, when the team is already short-staffed, or when the company has a strict policy against early release regardless of circumstances.
Can an Indian employer actually prevent an employee from leaving before the notice period ends? The legal reality is more nuanced than most employees and employers realize.
Technically, yes. If the employment contract specifies a 90-day notice period and the employee leaves after 15 days without paying the buyout, the employer can sue for breach of contract under the Indian Contract Act. In practice, this is rare. The cost and time of litigation (Indian courts are notoriously slow) almost always exceed the value of the unserved notice period. Most employers recover the amount by deducting it from the full-and-final settlement or withholding the experience/relieving letter until the amount is paid.
In India, a relieving letter is a critical employment document. It confirms that the employee has been formally released from service and has no outstanding obligations. Most Indian companies require a relieving letter from the previous employer before confirming a new hire. Employers use this as a tool to enforce notice periods. If the employee leaves without serving the full notice or paying the buyout, the employer may withhold the relieving letter. This can prevent the employee from joining the new company. While withholding a relieving letter indefinitely may be challenged as an unfair labor practice, it's a powerful practical deterrent that keeps most employees compliant.
No. Indian law doesn't allow forced labor under any circumstances (Article 23 of the Indian Constitution). An employer can't physically compel an employee to show up and work. What the employer can do is enforce the financial consequences: deduct the buyout amount from the settlement, withhold the relieving letter, and mark the employee as "absconding" in the HRIS (which can affect background verification for future employment). The practical enforcement is financial and administrative, not physical.
There's growing momentum to shorten notice periods in India's tech sector, driven by talent competition and changing workforce expectations.
Several major employers have reduced their notice periods in recent years. Cognizant moved from 90 to 30 days for most employees in 2023. Several startups and product companies (Flipkart, Razorpay, Swiggy) have standardized on 30-day notice. These companies position shorter notice as an employee-friendly benefit and a competitive differentiator in hiring. The logic: if you treat people well, you don't need a 90-day lock-in to retain them. NASSCOM's 2024 report recommends that the industry "reconsider" 90-day notice periods, citing their negative impact on employee experience and talent mobility.
Younger employees are less accepting of 90-day notice periods. They see them as restrictive and employer-centric. In negotiations, Gen Z candidates are more likely to ask for notice period reductions as part of the offer discussion. Some are walking away from offers that require 90-day notice in favor of companies offering 30 days. As Gen Z becomes a larger portion of the Indian workforce (projected to be 50% by 2030), companies that cling to 90-day notices may find themselves at a hiring disadvantage.