A formal company policy that outlines whether employees can pursue secondary employment, freelance work, or personal business ventures outside their primary job, along with the rules and disclosure requirements that apply.
Key Takeaways
A side hustle policy tells employees exactly what's allowed, what's restricted, and what requires disclosure when it comes to work they do outside their primary job. Think of it as the rules of the road for secondary employment. Without a policy, every moonlighting situation becomes an ad hoc judgment call. An engineer starts a consulting firm. A marketer launches a blog with affiliate income. A salesperson drives for a rideshare app. Are any of these okay? Without a written policy, the answer depends on which manager they report to, which HR person handles the case, and what mood everyone is in that day. That's not a defensible approach. A side hustle policy removes ambiguity. It specifies which activities are fine without any disclosure (like selling crafts on Etsy), which require notification (like freelancing in a related field), and which are prohibited outright (like working for a direct competitor). It also clarifies the consequences of violations and the process for requesting an exception.
The side hustle economy isn't a niche trend anymore. It's the norm, and employers without policies are exposed.
Remote work changed everything about side hustles. When employees worked in offices, moonlighting was limited to evenings and weekends. Now, a remote worker can toggle between two laptops at the same desk. 36% of remote workers report doing freelance or contract work alongside their primary role (Owl Labs, 2023). Without a policy, employers have no framework for addressing this reality.
For workers under 40, having a side hustle isn't just about extra income. It's part of their identity. They build personal brands, create content, sell products, and freelance. 38% of Gen Z and Millennial workers say they won't stop their side projects regardless of what their employer says (Deloitte, 2024). A blanket ban doesn't stop them. It just drives the activity underground where you can't manage it.
When an employee's side hustle creates a conflict and no policy exists, the company's response looks arbitrary. Was this employee fired for moonlighting, or for something else? Without a documented policy, consistent enforcement, and a clear paper trail, defending a termination decision becomes much harder. A written policy provides the legal foundation for action.
A complete side hustle policy covers these core areas. Leaving any one out creates gaps that employees and lawyers will exploit.
| Policy Section | What It Covers | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|
| Scope and definitions | Defines what counts as a side hustle: freelance work, gig economy, personal business, board seats, paid speaking, etc. | Prevents employees from arguing that their activity isn't covered by the policy |
| Permitted activities | Activities allowed without disclosure (unrelated part-time work, hobby income, volunteer roles) | Avoids over-regulation and builds trust |
| Activities requiring disclosure | Freelance work in a related field, consulting, advisory roles, significant time commitments | Gives HR visibility into potential conflicts before they escalate |
| Prohibited activities | Working for competitors, using company IP or resources, soliciting company clients or employees | Protects critical business interests |
| Disclosure process | How and when to disclose, review timeline, approval criteria, appeals process | Creates a fair, transparent system that employees will actually use |
| Consequences of violations | Graduated enforcement: warning, final warning, termination depending on severity | Ensures proportionate and consistent responses |
| IP and confidentiality reminders | Reinforces that NDAs and IP assignments remain in effect regardless of side activities | Closes the most common legal vulnerability |
Organizations fall on a spectrum when it comes to secondary employment policies. Your position should match your industry, risk profile, and culture.
No secondary employment of any kind without explicit written approval. Common in financial services (FINRA-regulated firms), defense contractors with security clearances, and some law firms. Employees must request approval for every outside activity, including paid board seats, speaking engagements, and freelance projects. This approach provides maximum control but generates resentment, especially among high performers who feel infantilized.
Employees can pursue side work but must submit a formal request and receive approval before starting. HR reviews each request against a conflict-of-interest checklist. This approach is common in professional services firms and regulated industries. The downside: it creates administrative overhead, delays can frustrate employees, and the approval criteria can feel subjective if not clearly documented.
Employees must inform HR about secondary employment by filling out a simple disclosure form. HR reviews for conflicts and responds within a set timeframe. If no conflict exists, the employee proceeds. If a potential conflict is identified, HR works with the employee to resolve it. This is the sweet spot for most organizations. It provides visibility without excessive control, respects employee autonomy, and creates a paper trail for compliance.
No disclosure required for most activities. Only competitive work or use of company resources is restricted. Common in tech startups, creative agencies, and companies with a strong trust-based culture. This approach attracts talent who value autonomy and signals that the company trusts its people. The risk: by the time a conflict surfaces, it may already have caused damage.
Building a policy from scratch involves input from multiple stakeholders. Don't let legal write it alone in a vacuum.
Before drafting anything, understand what's actually happening. Survey employees anonymously about their side activities (you'll be surprised by the results). Review existing employment contracts and handbooks for relevant clauses. Check your state's laws on off-duty conduct protections. Talk to managers about any side-hustle-related issues they've encountered. This audit reveals the scope of the situation and identifies the real risks, not the imagined ones.
Include HR, legal, IT (for resource-use concerns), a senior business leader (for competitive concerns), and at least one employee representative. Having employees involved in drafting increases buy-in when the policy launches. A policy drafted entirely by lawyers reads like a prohibition. A policy shaped by multiple perspectives reads like a fair agreement.
Use clear, direct sentences. Avoid legal jargon where possible. Give specific examples of what's allowed and what isn't. "You cannot work for a direct competitor" is vague. "You cannot perform paid work for any company listed on our competitor list (available on the company intranet), including consulting, freelancing, or advisory roles" is specific. Employees follow policies they understand.
Create a simple form that captures: the employee's name and department, the outside employer or business name, a brief description of the work, estimated weekly hours, whether it involves the company's competitors/clients/vendors, and whether it uses skills or knowledge gained at the primary job. Keep it to one page. The more friction you add, the less people will disclose.
Specify who reviews disclosures (typically the HRBP), what criteria they use to evaluate conflicts, the response timeline (5-10 business days is standard), and the appeals process if a request is denied. Also define how often existing disclosures are re-reviewed, since a side hustle that was fine a year ago might create a conflict after the employee changes roles internally.
Even the best policy fails if employees don't know about it or misunderstand it.
Inconsistent enforcement is worse than having no policy at all. It creates legal exposure and destroys trust.
Not every violation warrants the same response. An employee who forgot to disclose a weekend tutoring gig doesn't deserve the same treatment as someone secretly working for a competitor. Tier 1 (minor, no conflict): verbal reminder and request to submit a disclosure form. Tier 2 (non-competitive but undisclosed for an extended period): written warning and mandatory disclosure. Tier 3 (competitive or using company resources): final written warning, cessation of the outside activity, and possible termination depending on severity. Tier 4 (IP theft or client solicitation): immediate termination and potential legal action.
Document every enforcement action, including the specific policy clause violated, the evidence reviewed, the employee's explanation, and the action taken. If you terminate one employee for undisclosed freelancing but give another a verbal warning for the same thing, you'd better have a documented reason for the difference. Disparate treatment claims are the primary legal risk in policy enforcement.
Review the side hustle policy annually. The gig economy, remote work norms, and state laws change fast. What was appropriate in 2024 may be outdated by 2026. Gather data on how many disclosures were submitted, how many conflicts were identified, and what enforcement actions were taken. Use this data to refine the policy and close any gaps.
A practical template for the disclosure form that sits at the center of most side hustle policies.
| Field | Purpose | Required |
|---|---|---|
| Employee name and ID | Identification | Yes |
| Department and manager | Routing the review to the right HRBP | Yes |
| Outside employer or business name | Conflict check against competitor/client lists | Yes |
| Nature of the work | Assess overlap with primary role | Yes |
| Estimated hours per week | Evaluate potential fatigue or time conflict | Yes |
| Does it involve our competitors, clients, or vendors? | Direct conflict screening | Yes |
| Does it use skills, tools, or knowledge from your primary role? | IP and confidentiality screening | Yes |
| Will you use any company equipment or resources? | Resource misuse screening | Yes |
| Start date (or expected start) | Timeline tracking | Yes |
| Any additional context | Gives the employee space to explain nuance | No |