You run it. Hyring Meet is built around a copilot model: the recruiter or hiring manager leads the conversation, and the AI works as a copilot in the background, so the human judgment stays human while the busywork around it disappears.
In practice, that means the AI never takes over question-asking, pacing, or follow-ups. It sits underneath the live conversation doing the work a human note-taker would otherwise have to handle manually. While you're talking with the candidate, the AI is simultaneously producing a live transcript with speaker separation, structured notes mapped back to the specific skills you're assessing, technical and communication scores, per-skill ratings tied to the questions asked, sentiment and emotion tracking, and a set of integrity signals, things like tab changes, multiple faces in frame, eye-gaze, lip-sync, and plagiarism checks. All of that surfaces afterward as an AI-generated report, which you review side by side with your own interviewer scorecard.
This distinction matters because Hyring also has a second, separate product: the AI Video Interviewer, which does run interviews autonomously, asking questions directly to candidates without a human on the call. Hyring Meet is the human-led counterpart to that product, and the "copilot" framing is how the two are meant to be distinguished. If you're deciding between the two, this is the deciding factor: Hyring Meet is for when you or a hiring manager want to personally conduct the conversation and simply want the admin and scoring work automated behind you; the AI Video Interviewer is for when you want the AI itself to run first-pass screening at scale without a human present on the call.
